Giving the direction of inland when living in Southern California


I was history adventuring a couple of years ago with a good friend of mine here in Arizona when he used the expression "inland". We were traveling north on I-17 towards Flagstaff from Phoenix, and were looking for an exit to go to the right, and of course he meant "east". He had grown up in Southern California and I lived there in the '80s and neither of us gave the expression any thought - we both knew what it meant. And then it hit me what he had just said.

Southern California is considered from San Diego to Santa Barbara. No one really pays attention to the exact geography, it's just a given that San Francisco is in Northern California, and Monterey is in Central California. And while overall the coast of California goes north and south, the cities that are built on the coast aren't necessarily at right angles to the Pacific Ocean.

Speaking for myself, I'm pretty good at North-South-East-West, but anytime you're close to the Pacific Ocean, it's confusing to picture it as anything but the west coast. So going from Malibu to Calabasas, which is going north, is really better expressed as inland. That way you're just getting a general feeling that you're moving away from the ocean, and going further into dry land.

If you follow me here, you can see why exiting east from the I-17 freeway is inland. Well, it makes sense to me, and was so obvious to both my friend and I that at first we didn't even notice that he'd said "inland".

The opposite of inland is seaward, although I'd never heard of any using that term when I lived in Southern California. In Los Angeles, south of Santa Monica, anything inland from Sepulveda was called "the trees" and west of it was "the ocean". There you could have just said East and West, but since my friends lived on the oceanside, they were snooty about it, and "the trees" was a slightly derisive term.
History Adventuring on Patreon

 Click here to become a Patron!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why cars in the future won't need stop signs, red lights, or stripes on the road

Image
Time-travel with me into the future. Where we're going, we'll still need roads, but our cars won't need the kind of stuff that human drivers need, like stop signs, or stuff painted on the road. And if you're already panicking that computers will take over, don't worry, they already have. The fact that you're reading this right now combines so much amazing computing power that it would have been unthinkable to anyone in the 1960s, or '70s, when I was a kid. Speaking of being in the geriatric age group, if you're like me or older, you took a lot of pride in knowing the rules of the road, such as what to do at a stop sign if four cars approach at the same time, the difference between a "yield" sign and a "merge" sign, or maybe how to parallel park. But calm down there old-timer, that type of knowledge will just be as quaint as how to use a horse and buggy is nowadays. Sorry! The best way to picture how traffic will flow in the future is ...
Read more

Watching a neighborhood grow and change in Phoenix, Arizona

Image
I stopped to take a closer look yesterday at where the old Circle K had been in my neighborhood, which is a suburb of Phoenix. And it's got me to thinking about how much Phoenix grows and changes over the years, and how people feel about it. This particular neighborhood was built in the mid 1980s, when there had been only a smattering of houses and a community college (Glendale Community College, built in 1965). There are some houses that I can tell are from the 1970s, and a few even older, but what happened here is that the neighborhood suddenly appeared in 1985 or thereabouts. There are three shopping centers on the corner of 67th Avenue and Peoria - the one in the photo is called "Peoria Station", and it was designed to kinda look like a train station. The other three are called Westporte Village, Brittany Square, and Crossroads Plaza. I've lived in this neighborhood for a very long time, and no one ever uses those names, even though the signs are still up. But the...
Read more

Why did Adolf Hitler always have such a bad haircut?

Image
As someone who has been interested in history since I was a little kid, I've always asked the most childish questions, and quite often never got an answer. As a kid, I was told to run along and play, and don't bother the grownups, so I set my questions aside to work on when I myself became a grownup. But some questions I really haven't found a satisfactory answer for, and get thrown away as I find myself learning the more important stuff. I now understand the grownups, but the kid in me still has childish questions like "Why did Adolf Hitler always have such a bad haircut?" The first question to ask is whether a particular style (whether hair, clothing, etc.) was in style at the time. The moustache was, and you can Google a photo of Charlie Chaplin, who wore the same style of moustache at the time, and quite stylishly. The wide lapels were in style in the 1930s, as was were the tall shirt collars and small ties. But the haircut wasn't - it's just awful. Me...
Read more